Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Linang Xiao Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wong vs Xiao analysis and find out who is favored!
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Linang Xiao Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 0 Xiao
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wong has won 47.65% of points on their second serve, while Xiao has won 53.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wong, in recent form, has won 48.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Xiao has won 52.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.13% and 33.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wong has saved 59.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Xiao has saved 60.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wong has won 63.16% of matches played (W/L 48/ 28), with Xiao winning 51.67% (W/L 31/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 80/ 57), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Xiao has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 82/ 56).
- Player level: In the last year, Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/ 17), where as Xiao has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.22% of matches (W/L 21/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wong winning 1 times and Xiao being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wong winning 2 and Xiao winning 0. The last match between Wong and Xiao was at the Shenzhen 2 Challenger, 17-10-2023, First, Hard with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wong and Xiao have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wong winning 0 times and Xiao 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wong winning 1, and Xiao 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.36 while Xiao has played against players with an average rank of 191.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wong has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Xiao has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wong has converted 34.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Xiao has converted 36.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
181
Rank
180
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
667
Rank
666
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (101-78)
Career Total W/L
60% (90-60)
42% (10-14)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$23,250
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Linang Xiao |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 15 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:52 | 1:49:52 |
1st Serve % | 48% (41/85) | 55% (42/77) |
1st Serve Win% | 73% (30/41) | 64% (27/42) |
2nd Serve Win% | 59% (26/44) | 54% (19/35) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 13% (1/8) |
Return Points W% | 40% (31/77) | 34% (29/85) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(4) |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Linang Xiao
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
15
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Linang Xiao |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 42% (10/14) | 52% (11/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 46% (26/31) | 50% (25/25) |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (279/298) | 50% (248/250) |
Hard Win/Loss | 48% (10/11) | 52% (11/10) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.21 |
Aces Total | 162 | 51 |
DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.18 |
DFs Total | 72 | 43 |
Avg Match Time | 1:50:56 | 1:43:44 |
Avg Opp Rank | 344.67 | 120.43 |
1st Serve % | 55% (1027/1857) | 59% (816/1380) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (742/1027) | 64% (526/816) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (396/830) | 54% (304/564) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (57/165) | 36% (54/151) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (708/1888) | 40% (573/1438) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 45% (9/11) | 57% (4/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (10/24) | 50% (10/20) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 63% (5/8) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 56% (5/9) |
1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 80% (10/8) |
1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 20% (10/2) |
1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 18% (11/2) |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Andres Andrade
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
48 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Remy Bertola
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Moez Echargui
49%
(
54 of
110)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Blake Ellis
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Linang Xiao Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Zhenxiong Dong
Player
Linang Xiao
57%
(
71 of
125)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
59 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
34%
(
42 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Linang Xiao
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
12
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Linang Xiao
Player
Hanwen Li
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Linang Xiao
Player
Ye Cong Mo
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Linang Xiao
Player
Dominik Palan
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-7(6) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Linang Xiao
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Linang Xiao
67%
(
79 of
118)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
27
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
63 of
79)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
36 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
33 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Linang Xiao
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
58%
(
58 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
5
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Yunseong Chung
Player
Linang Xiao
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more